Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Andy Espersen's avatar

You begin your tirade by suggesting that "representative democracy [is] only ever viable up to a certain population size, after which it [is] unable to effectively scale".

Looking at for example the Scandinavian countries, you might appear to be right - but have you ever given any thought to the very obvious difference in electoral systems? By various means these countries make it impossible for any one party ever to have a majority in their parliaments - which again has the result that each and every political decision must be a compromise between a number of parties or individuals. All first-past-the-post electoral system (e.g. the UK and the US) in effect create a period of what actually amounts to one-party tyranny : the exact opposite of real democracy.

This also makes it exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, to follow Jordan Peterson in his fundamental philosophy of concentrating on (living and enacting) "the Integrity of the Individual" - which, if you look carefully at it, was the real basis of what became known as European Enlightenment. Soeren Kierkegaard (known as the father of existentialism) is the Christian philosopher who is closest to Jordan Peterson here

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts