Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nous's avatar

Let’s hope so but sooner rather than later. There is a bit of a difference perhaps between the elements of individual grief you posit and the elements of the societal angst you anticipate.

Grief is immediate and is the person left behind wanting to say yes. The person who leaves either through death or other has little interest in the grief, they have moved on.

The societal angst however comes almost too late for action and is based on each of us saying no to an unwanted upheaval rather than yes to something we desire.

So the angst will almost by definition be by the skin of our teeth if it is indeed in time, and the later we leave it to say no the more infrastructure is in place to enslave us. So the No needs to be a really serious no which destroys the infrastructure being placed around us. Leaving the infrastructure in place for the next clown who wants to control us is not an option. So the revolution you anticipate needs to be a complete rejection, not just a simper and a turned cheek.

Expand full comment
Nous's avatar

Pretty much so I think. The saying is that no one gets out of life alive, but neither do we get out without a measure of pain. How could we?

The technocrat’s counterfeit offering is numbness. The offering of life is the place where our consciousness rubs raw against reality. Which more or less puts the technocratic ideal as a bankruptcy at the bottom of the pile.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts